Minimization of waste from uranium purification, enrichment and fuel fabrication
ثبت نشده
چکیده
FOREWORD As any industry, nuclear industry generates a diverse range of waste which has to be managed in a safe manner to be acceptable to the public and the environment. The cost of waste management, the risks to the public and employees, and the detriment to the environment are dependent on the quantity and radioactive content of the waste generated. Waste minimization is a necessary activity needed to reduce the impact from nuclear fuel cycle operations and it is included in the national policy of some countries. In recognition of the importance of the subject, the IAEA has decided to review the current status of the work aimed at waste minimization in the nuclear fuel cycle. The waste minimization issues related to the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle are covered in Technical Reports Series No. 377 "Minimization of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Power Plants and the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle" published in 1995. The present report deals with the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle, including existing options, approaches, developments and some specific considerations to be taken into account in decision making on waste minimization. It has been recognized that, in comparison with the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle, much less information is available, and this report should be considered as a first attempt to analyse waste minimization practices and opportunities in uranium purification, conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication. Although mining and milling is an important part of the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle, these activities are excluded from consideration since relevant activities are covered in other IAEA publications. The IAEA wishes to acknowledge the efforts made by a number of experts from Member States in drafting, revising and consolidating this publication. In preparing this publication for press, staff of the IAEA have made up the pages from the original manuscript(s). The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the IAEA, the governments of the nominating Member States or the nominating organizations. Throughout the text names of Member States are retained as they were when the text was compiled. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products …
منابع مشابه
Using ICP - QQQ for UO 2 + product ion measurement to reduce uranium hydride ion interference and enable trace 236 U isotopic analysis Application note
Uranium 236 is a long-lived radionuclide which is created from the naturally occurring trace isotope 235U (0.72% abundance) by thermal neutron capture. This process leads to a natural abundance of 236U in the range from 10-14—10-13 relative to the major 238U isotope (236U/238U). 236U is also created during the process of uranium enrichment for nuclear fuel or weapons, and as a waste product fro...
متن کاملCrystal Chemistry of Immobilization of tetravalent Ce and Se in ceramic matrix of sodium zirconium phosphates
The safe and effective management of radioactive waste has been given utmost importance from the very inception of nuclear industry in India and it covers the entire range of activities from handling, treatment, conditioning, transport, storage and finally disposal. Radioactive waste is generated at various stages of the nuclear fuel cycle, which includes the mining and milling of uranium ore, ...
متن کاملECONOMICS OF FBR FUEL CYCLE S.Govindarajan Core Engineering and Component Handling Division,
Fuel cycle cost of a fast reactor is expected to play an important role of compensating for higher capital cost of a Fast Reactor and keeping the unit energy cost competitive. PFBR fuel cycle cost has been worked out by a committee constituted for the purpose. The cost has been worked out for a peak fuel burn-up of 1,00,000 MWd/t. The basic components of the PFBR fuel cycle are fabrication cost...
متن کاملAddressing the Implications of the Japanese Fuel Cycle through Transparency
Dr. Charles W. Nakhleh is a technical staff member in the Safeguards Systems Group at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. His research interests include the applications of environmental monitoring to international safeguards, safeguarding of advanced nuclear fuel cycles, and policy and technology issues related to the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nu...
متن کاملSfr Deployment Strategy for the Re-use of Spent Fuel in Korea
It is generally recognized that the spent fuel discharged from nuclear power plants constitutes the main contribution to nuclear waste. The management of spent fuel from nuclear power plants differs depending on the perspectives and scenarios posed by the countries directly concerned. However, there is a general consensus on the need for a deep geological repository and a reduction in the burde...
متن کامل